How many sats is one Procter & Gamble share?

184,072 sats ($153.04) at the close on October 13, 2026, or 0.00184 bitcoin.

Has Procter & Gamble beaten bitcoin?

Measured by share price, no: a share costs 89% fewer sats than its 2019 average (in dollars: +38%). Measured by the business (cash generated per share and its growth), −26% a year in bitcoin terms, behind bitcoin's supply growth.

Did Procter & Gamble's buybacks beat bitcoin?

No. It spent $55.3 billion buying back its own stock since 2019. Each $1 is now worth $1.10 in shares; the same $1 in bitcoin, bought at the same times, would be worth $4.05. (Per dollar: at that size the buying itself would have moved bitcoin's price.)

Sats Ledger

Companies · Consumer staples

Procter & Gamble (PG), measured in bitcoin

One Procter & Gamble share costs 184,072 sats today ($153.04). That's 44% more sats than a year ago, so over the past year the stock beat holding bitcoin. Since 2019, its shareholder return has been +6.6% a year in dollars, slower than the money supply grew (+6.6%), and −26% a year measured in bitcoin.

Next earnings: Thursday, October 22 before the open.

Price in sats

184,072

What one share costs in bitcoin today ($153.04). One bitcoin is 100 million sats.

Past year, in bitcoin

+44% +3.8% in $

More sats per share than a year ago. Above zero means the stock beat simply holding bitcoin.

Shareholder return since COVID

+6.6%/yr −26%/yr in ₿

Cash the business produces per share, plus how fast that grows, since 2019. Trailed new dollars (+6.6%/yr); trailed bitcoin (+1.8%/yr new supply).

Buybacks vs bitcoin

$1.10 vs $4.05

What each $1 it spent buying back its own stock since 2019 is worth today, versus the same $1 in bitcoin bought at the same times. Bitcoin wins.

Quarterly revenue would buy

1.41% of all bitcoin

$21.2 billion of revenue in the quarter to Jun 30, 2026, at that quarter's average price: ₿296,000 of the 21 million that will ever exist.

Pays its own way?

Since mid-2022 it paid shareholders $2.8 billion more than its business generated; the gap came from paid out 105% of free cash flow.

Procter & Gamble share price since 2019, in dollars and in bitcoin, both indexed to 100 — Both lines start at 100 (the 2019 average). The gap between them is what measuring in bitcoin changes.

How it compares: consumer staples

Sorted by the past year in bitcoin. Within the same window every stock is divided by the same bitcoin price, so the order matches dollars; what bitcoin adds is the line at zero: above it, the stock beat holding bitcoin.

Company	Sats per share	Past year, ₿	Vs 2019 avg, ₿	Shareholder return, ₿
Coca-Cola KO	108,382	+87%	−86%	−22%/yr
Philip Morris International PM	239,700	+73%	−81%	−24%/yr
Altria MO	86,070	+53%	−89%	−21%/yr
Walmart WMT	135,047	+53%	−76%	−29%/yr
Procter & Gamble PG	184,072	+44%	−89%	−26%/yr
Costco COST	1,148,200	+42%	−71%	−17%/yr
Mondelez International MDLZ	73,970	+39%	−91%	−27%/yr
PepsiCo PEP	153,113	+19%	−92%	−16%/yr

Questions

How many sats is one Procter & Gamble share?: 184,072 sats ($153.04) at the close on October 13, 2026, or 0.00184 bitcoin.
Has Procter & Gamble beaten bitcoin?: Measured by share price, no: a share costs 89% fewer sats than its 2019 average (in dollars: +38%). Measured by the business (cash generated per share and its growth), −26% a year in bitcoin terms, behind bitcoin's supply growth.
Did Procter & Gamble's buybacks beat bitcoin?: No. It spent $55.3 billion buying back its own stock since 2019. Each $1 is now worth $1.10 in shares; the same $1 in bitcoin, bought at the same times, would be worth $4.05. (Per dollar: at that size the buying itself would have moved bitcoin's price.)

Full history, charts and quarterly numbers for Procter & Gamble →